Surat Court Issues Bailable Warrant Against Anurag Kashyap
A Surat court has issued a bailable warrant against Anurag Kashyap after he failed to appear in a case over his April 2025 remarks on the Brahmin community.

Anurag Kashyap’s April 2025 apology over a social media post has not closed the legal chapter. On Monday, a Surat court issued a bailable warrant against the filmmaker after he failed to appear in connection with a case over remarks that allegedly targeted the Brahmin community.
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate JV Chauhan passed the order and listed the matter for further hearing on December 24. A bailable warrant, as the name suggests, does not lead directly to arrest: the accused can secure release by furnishing bail as specified by the court.
The case so far
The 54-year-old director, known for Gangs of Wasseypur and Black Friday, is facing proceedings under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections 192 (promoting enmity between different groups), 352 (intentional insult with intent to provoke a breach of peace), and 352(2) (circulating false rumours).
The case flows from a complaint by lawyer Kamlesh Raval, a legal advisor to Hindutva outfits Bajrang Dal and Vishwa Hindu Parishad. In May, the court directed that the case be registered. Since then, according to Raval, summonses were sent, and when the filmmaker stayed away, the court ordered a public summons be printed in a Mumbai newspaper. Still, he did not appear.
What Kashyap said
The complaint points to an April 16, 2025 post on X. When a user named Aaditya objected, Kashyap is said to have replied angrily and asked what Aaditya had achieved by being a Brahmin. The petitioner contended this insulted the whole community and risked promoting enmity between religious and caste groups.
The exchange had a film connection. Kashyap’s tweet was a reaction to objections by Akhil Bharatiya Brahmin Samaj and Vipra Sena over certain portions of the Hindi film Phule after its trailer was released.
Apology, but no closure
Days after the row broke, Kashyap apologised on Instagram. He said he crossed a boundary by using “abusive language” while responding in anger, and apologised to the community, his friends and his family. At the time, many assumed the matter had cooled. Monday’s order makes clear the legal machinery had moved on regardless.
Here is what our readers need to know at a glance:
- The warrant: Bailable, so Kashyap can secure release by furnishing bail.
- The sections: BNS 192, 352 and 352(2) — enmity, intentional insult, false rumours.
- The trigger: An April 16, 2025 X post and a follow-up reply to a user named Aaditya.
- The next date: December 24 before the Surat court.
Why it matters
For a filmmaker whose work has often provoked strong reactions, this case is a reminder that public statements carry legal weight long after the social media storm has settled. A bailable warrant is not the most severe step a court can take, but it signals that repeated non-appearance is not being ignored.
It is also worth noting the sequence: a complaint in May, registration of the case, summonses, a public notice, and only then a warrant. Courts typically escalate in stages, and Monday’s order is that escalation made visible. The pragmatic next step for Kashyap is clear: furnish bail and participate in the process. The broader question — whether the case moves toward trial and how it shapes public conversations about caste, cinema and free expression — will play out over the coming months.
Source: Hindustan Times
The room talks
0 comments